There’s a delicacy seen in Alternative processes that really appeals to me, and how a moment captured on modern negatives can be transformed into something that looks like it came from another era or another world. Beyond silver, there is a realm of possibilities to work with that allows you to present the final print in a way that compliments the subject. I liken it to playing music and having options in instruments, keys and tempos. ~ a piece for Cello is not going to have quite the same emotional impact if, say… played on a Zither. Working with the vintage processes has definitely altered the way I take photos. I look at the landscape differently now, and see views I normally would brush over. I think about the way in which I will present it as a whole, how it will look, how it will feel, as colors are so closely related to and can arouse emotions. Cyanotypes are my favorite thus far, with their range of blues and violets, I find absolutely spellbinding~ deep and moody, the colors of the sea, dark clouds, the midnight sky. Not too mention the fact that they seem to be the least offensive to the environment. And the Cyanotypes printed on old book pages? That came about through no planning. I was working on something for a friend when I realized that I had no paper for coating. Not wanting to break the work vibe by leaving the house, I started wandering thru the house looking for some hidden stash of papers when I came across some books I was giving away. The texture and yellowness of the paper ~ which I guessed might be indicative of an acidic state ~ caught my eye. So, I removed and used the plain pages, and then considering it was Gibran, I threw his text into the mix. It worked out ok, I think, and from there I’ve been tinkering with a series using old and odd ephemera from my past as substrates. Travel notes, maps, pages from dream journals, old love notes, newspaper clippings, seemingly insignificant scraps etc… better to turn them into something than to have them lay idly a drawer, almost forgotten.

Beyond the aesthetic quality of these processes , I really, really dig the fact that all of these can be created without most modern conveniences. Man, that is a powerful and comforting feeling to me. I can shoot paper negatives or sheet film in my pinhole cameras, develop, peel or oil the paper negatives if necessary, and make positives by contact. There is no dependency on enlargers or electricity. As long as there’s darkness and light in the world I’m good…
Not that I’m anti-computer ~ I’m not, otherwise I never would have come to know you, Chris or other great folks via that ‘big photo sharing site‘ and other forums. I only just got my first computer three years ago because someone gave me one. Digital photography and computer generated effects leave me cold. Wait, let me rephrase that. For me personally, working with digital photography and creating digital effects just doesn’t invoke in me any great desire as:
A) I’m graceful but flighty. I'm the kind of person who spaces out and leaves stuff on the roof or bumper of the car and drives away. Or drops the camera while crossing a river. Or gets distracted and leaves them in the yard overnight…. or for days. Or gives cameras away on a whim. If it’s a hacked low fi or homemade cardboard pinhole camera…. Not a problem, if I can’t fix or find it, I can hook up a new one in no time. I can’t do that with an expensive DSLR. It’s just the kind of person I am: Low Fidelity cameras fit my lifestyle. There’s a freedom that comes with using them. For more control over light and shutter speed I think my most “sophisticated’ cameras are my old Canon RM and a Mamiya C3 (which must weigh 6 pounds!).
B) Why buy and bother with photosh*p when I already have a darkroom? Albeit equally vintage as I’m using ancient gear including an old 1950’s Burke and James Solar enlarger which, by the way, someone gave to me after hearing that I love old cameras. That’s another phenomena that I’m sure a lot of vintage camera users have experienced ~ that many of older generation folks still have cameras they won’t toss out for sentimental reasons, but are more that happy to pass on to someone who might use them. I have met the coolest people this way, and I love to sit and hear the little stories behind the cameras. These folks didn’t come from a “disposable” mind set, which is fortunate for all of us who love vintage.

Ecologically, is there any benefit to digital over film? Is analog photography on the decline? I honestly don’t know, and I’m tired of all the debates. I say quit talking about it and go out there and shoot. I‘m going to keep using film and paper as long as it‘s around. I don’t dismiss digital photography. It’s taken photojournalism to a new level which I like, yet photography is still about one thing: the image. I don’t look at photo, first wondering “Gee, how was this made? Is this from film or digital?”. I feel first, then marvel at it’s making. I relate to art through emotions, and can always appreciate how work I find impressive or interesting was made. I just personally prefer the hands-on analog ways of doing it myself. There’s nothing absolutely inferior or obsolete about analog, as long as you understand your chemicals, and how to mix, handle and dispose of them properly.

You also may want to visit Leslie's alternative process photo gallery
on her website "Under The Amber Moon"